Audience: Customers and GeoCue / LP360 Support
Applies to: Static GNSS base observations used for PPK Trajectory Processing, RTK bases or control evaluation
Purpose
This article explains how to correctly submit a base observation file to OPUS so it can be evaluated reliably. It is intended to:
- Help customers submit usable OPUS solutions on the first attempt
- Reduce common errors that lead to rejected base observations
- Align submissions with how GeoCue evaluates OPUS results
This article covers submission only.
What You Need Before Submitting
- Static GNSS observation file (RINEX preferred; vendor formats may work if OPUS supports them)
- Antenna model (exact make and model used during the observation)
- Antenna height (ARP height, in meters)
- Email address to receive OPUS results
Step-by-Step: Submitting a Base File to OPUS
STEP 1 — Export the Base Observation File
- Export the base as a static observation file from your GNSS receiver / processing software
- RINEX is preferred; vendor formats are acceptable if OPUS supports them
- Use the full observation duration (do not trim unless instructed)
If your receiver produces proprietary formats (e.g., Topcon TPS), you may need to convert the raw data to RINEX before submitting to OPUS.
See vendor‑specific conversion guidance here:
Converting Raw GNSS Data to RINEX (Topcon Examples)
STEP 2 — Go to OPUS
Open the OPUS submission page:
https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/
STEP 3 — Upload the Observation File
- Select your observation file
- Confirm the file uploads successfully (no format errors)
OPUS error: “Request Entity Too Large”
If OPUS rejects your submission due to file size, your RINEX file may need to be decimated.
- OPUS internally decimates to 30‑second epochs
- Removing unused constellations reduces file size
See step‑by‑step instructions here:
Troubleshooting: OPUS: Request Entity Too Large – Decimating a RINEX File
STEP 4 — Enter Antenna Information (Critical)
- Antenna Model: Select the exact antenna used
- Antenna Height:
- Enter the ARP height (vertical height to the antenna reference point)
- Units must be meters
- Do not convert slant height unless you know your workflow requires it
Common mistakes to avoid:
- Wrong antenna model selected
- Feet entered instead of meters
- Slant height entered as vertical height
STEP 5 — Enter Email and Submit
- Enter a valid email address
- Submit the job
- Wait for the OPUS results email
Recommended Observation Practices (Strongly Encouraged)
- Observe the base for at least 1 hour (2+ hours preferred)
If your base observation includes gaps, extra time before/after the survey, or does not align with the flight duration, trimming the RINEX file may help.
Learn How to Trim a RINEX File
- Use a stable setup (tripod or fixed mount)
- Avoid obstructions (trees/buildings) and reflective surfaces
- Collect a second independent occupation when possible
A single OPUS solution cannot confirm correctness. Repeat observations help verify stability and reduce the risk of setup/environmental bias.
After Submission: What Happens Next
- OPUS processes the observation and emails a report
- The report includes quality indicators (e.g., RMS, peak-to-peak, CORS used)
- Evaluate the result using OPUS metrics and repeatability
- Import into Survey Manager
to create a Survey Nail for use in your Trajectory Processing.
Troubleshooting
- OPUS fails to process: The file format may be unsupported, or the file may be corrupted
- Results look poor: Re-check antenna height/model, observation duration, and site environment
- Base rejected: Often due to metadata errors or lack of repeatability (only one occupation)
Base observation quality checks
If OPUS results are inconsistent or fail quality checks, review the base observation file itself:
- RINEX header (antenna, interval, constellations)
- Observation duration and overlap
- Constellation support and sampling rate
Summary
- Submit a clean static base file (RINEX preferred)
- Enter correct antenna model and ARP height (meters)
- Prefer longer observations and repeat occupations
- OPUS submission quality directly affects RTK reliability
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.